Osteosarcoma

Key Points:

Description:

Osteosarcoma, also known as osteogenic sarcoma, is a malignant tumor of bone that is primarily found in the extremities, but may present in the axial skeleton. The histologic diagnosis is defined by the specific finding of osteoid or woven bone within a stroma or background of malignant spindle cells. Historically, the different types of osteosarcomas have been classified into “classical” or “juxtacortical”. This distinction not only highlighted the natural history of these tumors, but also their clinical presentations and the prognosis as well. Currently, the more common osteosarcoma is referred to as classic high-grade or conventional osteosarcoma. The other, less common variants are juxtacortical (parosteal or periosteal), intracortical, telangiectatic, extraskeletal, and secondary osteosarcoma. The latter is often related to post-radiation effects or malignant transformation associated with Paget disease.

Epidemiology:

Osteosarcomas account for approximately 1% of all cancers diagnosed annually in the US, and about 3% of all childhood cancers. They are the most common primary bone tumors affecting children and young adults. They are recognized to have a bimodal age distribution. Approximately 75% of the patients are between 8 and 25 years of age.

Imaging Studies:

On imaging, the radiographs of a patient with an osteosarcoma are usually very telling. These lesions are typically located in the metaphysis, and have involvement of the canal. They have a mixed radiodense (osteoblastic) and radiolucent (osteolytic) pattern with extension into the adjacent soft tissue. Since these are high-grade malignant tumors, the destructive growth pattern of the tumor is typically bound or contained by a periosteal reaction. If the lesion is growing rapidly but steadily there may be enough time for Sharpey’s fibers to ossify and produce a “sunburst” pattern. However, if the lesion is growing rapidly, the periosteum will appear to be lifted off or tented at its margins, often referred to as a “Codman triangle”.
 
The appearance of the lesion on radiographs will correlate with the predominant tissue type within the sarcoma. This is primarily true for the high-grade telangiectatic osteosarcoma that has large vacuous blood-filled cysts and can sometimes be mistaken for an aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC) or a giant cell tumor (GCT).
 
In addition to radiographs, MRI is an essential study for evaluating the suspected osteosarcoma. The intraosseous extent and soft-tissue component of the lesion are more clearly defined by an MRI with and without intravenous contrast. MRI also identifies the presence or absence of a margin between the tumor and the neurovascular bundles and predicts the feasibility of a limb salvage resection.
 
Since approximately 20% of patients present with pulmonary metastasis, a CT scan of the chest should be performed, as part of the initial group of staging studies. A technetium-99 bone scan is another crucial staging study that is useful for screening the entire skeleton. While the lung is the most common site for metastatic involvement, the whole-body bone scan is excellent for identifying occult metastatic skeletal lesions or skip lesions within the same bone.

Treatment:

Initial treatment of a suspected osteosarcoma consists of an incisional biopsy with adherence to well-defined tumor principles, ideally by the surgeon that will be performing the definitive procedure.
 
The treatment protocol for high-grade osteosarcoma includes chemotherapy and surgical resection. This consists of neoadjuvent chemotherapy with three or four courses of a multidrug regimen to decrease tumor load and increase tumor necrosis prior to surgical treatment.  This is followed by surgical resection and additional chemotherapy. The course of treatment can take up to a year.
 
Limb salvage is possible due to advancements in imaging and chemotherapy, as surgical resection can almost always be done without an amputation of the extremity. The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy reduces tumor size, making the resection easier, and gives the pediatric oncologist a prognostic predictor of the patient’s chance of survival based on the necrosis of the resected sarcoma. Unfortunately, this has not produced increased survival compared with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy alone.
 
For lesions involving either the upper or lower extremity, a limb salvage surgical resection can improve functional outcome without sacrificing local disease control as long as complete tumor resection is anatomically possible. Allografts and metal endoprostheses are common means of reconstructing bone defects that result from sarcoma resections. Expandable prostheses have been developed for reconstruction in skeletally immature children and allow lengthening of the limb, thus making limb salvage surgery an option in the younger, skeletally immature patient.

Complications:

Related Videos:

POSNAcademy logo

Peer Reviewed Video Learning

View Related Videos

References:

  1. Abudu A, Sferopoulos NK, Tillman RM, Carter SR, Grimer RJ The surgical treatment and outcome of pathological fractures in localized osteosarcoma. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996; 78(5):694-698.
  2. Arkader A, Gebhardt MC, Dormans JP. Bone and Soft-Tissue Tumors. Lovell and Winter's Pediatric Orthopaedics. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 7th ed. 2014.
  3. Arkader A, Viola DC, Morris CD, Boland PJ, Healey JH. Coaxial extendible knee equalizes limb length in children with osteogenic sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 459: 60-65.
  4. Bacci G, Bertoni F, Longhi A, Ferrari S, Forni C, Biagini R, Bacchini P, Donati D, Manfrini M, Bernini G, Lari S. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-grade central osteosarcoma of the extremity. Histologic response to preoperative chemotherapy correlates with histologic subtype of the tumor. Cancer 2003; 97(12): 3068-3075.
  5. Bacci G, Ferrari S, Longhi A, Donati D, Manfrini M, Giacomini S, Briccoli A, Forni C, Galletti S. Nonmetastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity with pathologic fracture at presentation: local and systemic control by amputation or limb salvage after preoperative chemotherapy. Acta Orthop Scand 2003;74(4):449-454.
  6. Bacci G, Forni C, Longhi A, Ferrari S, Mercuri M, Bertoni F, Serra M, Briccoli A, Balladelli A, Picci P. Local recurrence and local control of non-metastatic osteosarcoma of the extremities: a 27-year experience in a single institution. J Surg Oncol 2007; 96:118.
  7. Bacci G, Longhi A, Versari M, Mercuri M, Briccoli A, Picci P. Prognostic factors for osteosarcoma of the extremity treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: 15-year experience in 789 patients treated at a single institution. Cancer 2006; 106 (5): 1154-1161.
  8. Bramer JA, Abudu AA, Grimer RJ, Carter SR, Tillman RM. Do pathological fractures influence survival and local recurrence rate in bony sarcomas? Eur J Cancer 2007;43(13):1944-1951.
  9. Ferrari S, Briccoli A, Mercuri M, Bertoni F, Cesari M, Longhi A, Bacci G. Late relapse in osteosarcoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2006;28(7):418-422.
  10. Gherlinzoni F, Picci P, Bacci G, Campanacci D. Limb sparing versus amputation in osteosarcoma. Correlation between local control, surgical margins and tumor necrosis: Istituto Rizzoli experience. Ann Oncol 1992; 3(Suppl 2): S23-S27.
  11. Hauben EI, Weeden S, Pringle J, Van Marck EA, Hogendoom PC. Does the histological subtype of high-grade central osteosarcoma influence the response to treatment with chemotherapy and does it affect overall survival? A study on 570 patients of two consecutive trials of the European Osteosarcoma Intergroup. Eur J Cancer 2002;38(9):1218-1225.
  12. Meyers PA, Heller G, Healey J, Huvos A, Lane J, Marcove R, Applewhite A, Vlamis V, Rosen G. Chemotherapy for nonmetastatic osteogenic sarcoma: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10(1): 5-15.
  13. Meyers PA, Heller G, Healey JH, Huvos A, Applewhite A, Sun M, LaQuaglia M. Osteogenic sarcoma with clinically detectable metastasis at initial presentation. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11(3):449-453.
  14. Picci P, Sangiorgi L, Rougraff B. Relationship of Chemotherapy-induced necrosis and surgical margins to local recurrence in osteosarcoma. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12: 2699.
  15. Springfield DS,Schmidt R, Graham-Pole J, Marcus RB Jr, Spanier SS, Enneking WF. Surgical treatment for osteosarcoma. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988; 70(8):1124-1130.
  16. Winkler K, Bieling P, Bielack S, Delling G, Dose C, Jurgens H, Kotz R, Ritter J, Salzer-Kuntschik M. Local control and survival from the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group studies of the German Society of Pediatric Oncology and the Vienna Bone Tumor Registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991; 270:79-86.

Top Contributors:

Henock T. Wolde-Semait, MD
Scott B. Rosenfeld, MD