Blount's Diesease-Infantile

Key Points:

  • Disorder that affects the proximal posteromedial tibial growth plate.
  • Etiology unknown; potentially related to increased body weight
  • Infantile form has its onset in children less than 3 years of age
  • Differential diagnoses include internal tibial torsion and physiologic genu varum. 
  • Surgery is recommended at or prior to 4 years of age and Langenskiold Stage IV or earlier to minimize risk of recurrence.

Description:

  Blount disease is a disorder of the proximal (posteromedial) tibial growth plate, which results in progressive bowing of the tibia. This can lead to significant deformity and limb length discrepancy.

  Though initially described by Ehrlacher in 1922, this disorder was popularized by Walter Putnam Blount in 1937 (Blount, 1937).

Epidemiology:

  Onset is in children less than 3 years of age. Patients with infantile (early onset) Blount disease were found to be more likely to be bilateral (4.3 times more so) than those with late onset Blount disease. They were also found to be less likely to be African American and male compared to those with late onset Blount disease (Rivero, 2015).

Clinical Findings:

  The presenting feature is tibial bowing and internal tibial torsion. The bowing in infantile Blount disease is seen more in the proximal tibia compared to the bowing of tibial torsion that is seen mostly in the mid to distal diaphysis of the tibia (Cover up test- Davids, 2000). These children have internal tibial torsion and may have lateral collateral ligament laxity in the knee. This may manifest as a lateral thrust in stance phase of gait. In cases with unilateral involvement, the affected side may be shorter than the contralateral side.

Imaging Studies:

  It is important to differentiate tibial torsion from infantile tibia vara as early intervention with non-operative treatment has the best chances of success in tibia vara. Levine and Drennan, in their landmark paper, reported that 29/30 patients with metaphyseodiaphyseal (M-D) angle of more than 11 degrees went on to develop changes of tibia vara, whereas only 3/58 patients with the M-D angle of less than 11 degrees went on to develop changes of tibia vara (Levine, 1982). 
 
  Radiographs of children with infantile Blount disease may show metaphyseal beaking, increased posteromedial slope of both the metaphysis and epiphysis. Advanced stages of the disease may be associated with physeal bar formation. Langenskiold has described these stages (Langenskiold, 1952)
  • Stage I: Medial metaphyseal beaking. 
  • Stage II: Saucer shaped defect of medial metaphysis. 
  • Stage III: Saucer deepens into a step.
  • Stage IV: Epiphysis bent down over medial beak. 
  • Stage V: Double epiphysis, severe posteromedial depression
  • Stage VI: Development of medial physeal bony bar.
  The Langenskiold classification is not strictly speaking a severity classification. It describes the stages that a patient with untreated Blount disease may go through. Natural history studies have shown that patients in radiographic stages I-III may undergo spontaneous resolution. (Shinohara, 2002)
Children with infantile tibia vara usually have a normal distal femur, compared to those with adolescent tibia vara in whom distal femoral varus is frequently seen (Gordon, 2006).

  MR imaging in patients with infantile Blount disease has shown medial meniscal abnormalities, posteromedial depression of the medial tibial plateau, as well as increased thickness of the medial tibial cartilage (Ho-Fung, 2013; Sabharwal, 2012).

Etiology:

  The etiology is not clearly defined. There is some suggestion that obesity and early weight bearing may have a role. Children with Blount disease have higher BMI (Scott, 2007) and advanced bone age compared to their peers (Sabharwal, 2013). A Nigerian study demonstrated decreased zinc and increased alkaline phsophatase levels in the patients with Blount disease (Giwa, 2004). 

Treatment:

Bracing in Blount disease: 

  Bracing in patients with early onset Blount disease has been shown to have good results (Zionts,1998). Best results are seen if bracing is initiated in children less than 3 years of age and Langenskiold stages I and II. The risk factors for failure include bilateral pathology, (Richards, 1998) instability, obesity, and delayed bracing (Raney, 1998).

Guided growth: 

  There has been increasing interest in using guided growth with proximal lateral tibial hemi-epiphysiodesis to correct the proximal tibial deformities. (Scott, 2012). This is a simple procedure. However, it carries the risk of recurrent varus once the hardware is removed and also does not correct the internal tibial torsion that is an integral part of the multiplane deformity. There have also been reports of implant failure when titanium plates and cannulated titanium screws are used in this patient population (Schroerlucke S, 2009).  Also, larger patients with a greater degree of deformity have been shown to be at greater risk for failure with this technique (McIntosh AL, 2009).

Acute correction of Blount's disease

  There are many techniques of proximal tibial osteotomy: opening wedge, closing wedge, spherical dome or oblique plane osteotomy, which can be used for correction in Blount disease. 
The proximal tibial varus and internal tibial torsion deformities can be corrected acutely with an oblique plane osteotomy as described by Rab (Rab, 1988). The osteotomy is best performed prior to age 4 years and in Langenskiold stage II and III to decrease the risk of recurrent deformity (Chotigavanichaya, 2002).  Compartment syndrome and neurovascular injury are potential risks associated with acute correction, particularly in patients with more significant deformity (Ferriter P, 1987). 

Gradual correction of Blount's disease

  Gradual correction of all the components of the deformity (varus, procurvatum, internal torsion and shortening) can be performed using an external fixator. Overcorrection into valgus is recommended given the possibility of recurrent varus deformity. 
 

Hemi-plateau elevation for high grade Blount's disease

  MR imaging in patients with infantile Blount disease has shown medial meniscal abnormalities as well as posteromedial depression of the medial tibial plateau (Ho-Fung, 2013). If there is intra-articular instability with medial plateau depression with the slope more than 30 degrees, hemi-plateau elevation may be useful. (Schoenecker, 1992) However, there is evidence that radiographs over-estimate the amount of medial plateau elevation and that a portion of the medial tibial plateau is unossified in severe Blount disease (Sabharwal S, 2012; Stanitski DF, 1999).  Therefore, if hemi-plateau elevation is being considered, careful evaluation of either a preoperative MRI or arthrogram is critical so that the severity of medial plateau depression can be quantified to determine the amount of correction that will be needed. 
Double elevating osteotomy: This is performed in cases of medial plateau depression as well as uncorrected tibial varus and internal torsion (Gregosiewicz, 1998).  The addition of proximal lateral tibial epiphysiodesis to minimize the risk of recurrent varus has also been described (Van Huyssteen, 2005).  This may be done with an external fixator.  

Physeal bar excision

  Patients with physeal bars (Langenskiold Stage V and VI) who are younger than 7 years of age and with the bar smaller than 30% of the physis, may benefit from a medial proximal tibial physeal bar resection along with a concomitant osteotomy of the tibia to correct the varus deformity (Andrade, 2006).

Complications:

  Complications seen in Blount disease are due to either undercorrection or recurrence of the deformity leading to persistent varus. Long-term studies have suggested that genu varum increases the risk of knee arthritis in adulthood.  Other complications are specific to the type of surgery that is performed, but include neurovascular injury, compartment syndrome, nonunion, implant failure, wound healing complication, pin site infection or need for further surgical intervention.

References:

  1. Andrade N, Johnston CE. Medial epiphysiolysis in severe infantile tibia vara. J Pediatr Orthop. 2006; 26(5): 652-8.
  2. Blount WP. Tibia vara: osteochondrosis deformans tibiae. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 1937; 19: 1-29.
  3. Chotigavanichaya C, Salinas G, Green T, Moseley CF, Otsuka NY. Recurrence of varus deformity after proximal tibial osteotomy in Blount disease: long-term follow-up. J Pediatr Orthop. 2002; 22(5): 638-41.
  4. Davids JR, Blackhurst DW, Allen Jr BL. Clinical evaluation of bowed legs in children. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2000; 9(4): 278-84.
  5. Ferriter P, Shapiro F. Infantile tibia vara: factors affecting outcome following proximal tibial osteotomy.J Pediatr Orthop. 1987; 7:1-7.
  6. Giwa OG, Anetor JI, Alonge TO, Agbedana EO.  Biochemical observations in Blount’s disease (infantile tibia vara). J Natl Med Assoc. 2004; 96(9): 1203-7.
  7. Gordon JE, King DJ, Luhmann SJ, Dobbs MB, Schoenecker PL. Femoral deformity in tibia vara. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88(2): 380-6.
  8. Gregosiewicz A, Wo?ko I, Kandzierski G, Drabik Z. Double-elevating osteotomy of tibiae in the treatment of severe cases of Blount's disease. J Pediatr Orthop. 1989; 9(2): 178-81.
  9. Ho-Fung V, Jaimes C, Delgado J, Davidson RS, Jaramillo D. MRI evaluation of the knee in children with infantile Blount disease: tibial and extra-tibial findings. Pediatr Radiol. 2013; 43(10): 1316-26.
  10. Langenskiold A. Tibia vara; (osteochondrosis deformans tibiae); a survey of 23 cases. Acta Chir Scand. 1952; 103(1): 1-22.
  11. Levine AM, Drennan JC. Physiological bowing and tibia vara. The metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle in the measurement of bowleg deformities. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982; 64(8): 1158-63.
  12. McIntosh AL, Hanson CM, Rathjen KE. Treatment of adolescent tibia vara with hemiepiphysiodesis: risk factors for failure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91(12):2873-2879.
  13. Rab GT. Oblique tibial osteotomy for Blount's disease (tibia vara). J Pediatr Orthop. 1988; 8(6): 715-20.
  14. Raney EM, Topoleski TA, Yaghoubian R, Guidera KJ, Marshall JG. Orthotic treatment of infantile tibia vara. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998; 18(5): 670-4.
  15. Richards BS, Katz DE, Sims JB. Effectiveness of brace treatment in early infantile Blount's disease. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998; 18(3): 374-80.
  16. Rivero SM, Zhao C, Sabharwal S. Are patient demographics different for early-onset and late-onset Blount disease? Results based on meta-analysis. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2015; 24(6): 515-20.
  17. Sabharwal S, Sakamoto SM, Zhao C. Advanced bone age in children with Blount disease: a case-control study. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013; 33(5): 551-7.
  18. Sabharwal S, Wenokor C, Mehta A, Zhao C. Intra-articular morphology of the knee joint in children with blount disease: a case-control study using MRI. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94(10): 883-90.
  19. Schoenecker PL, Johnston R, Rich MM, Capelli AM. Elevation of the medical plateau of the tibia in the treatment of Blount disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992; 74(3): 351-8.
  20. Schroerlucke S, Bertrand S, Clapp J, Bundy J, Gregg FO. Failure of orthofix eight-plate for the treatment of Blount disease. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009; 29:57-60.
  21. Scott AC. Treatment of infantile Blount disease with lateral tension band plating. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012; 32(1): 29-34.
  22. Scott AC, Kelly CH, Sullivan E. Body mass index as a prognostic factor in development of infantile Blount disease. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007; 27(8): 921–5.
  23.  Shinohara Y, Kamegaya M, Kuniyoshi K, Moriya H. Natural history of infantile tibia vara. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002; 84(2): 263-268.
  24. Stanitski DF, Stanitski CL, Trumble S. Depression of the medial tibial plateau in early-onset Blount disease: myth or reality? J Pediatr Orthop. 19(2):265-269.
  25. Van Huyssteen AL, Hastings CJ, Olesak M, Hoffman EB. Double-elevating osteotomy for late-presenting infantile Blount's disease: the importance of concomitant lateral epiphysiodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005; 87(5): 710-5.
  26. Zionts LE, Shean CJ. Brace treatment of early infantile tibia vara. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998; 18(1): 102-9.

Top Contributors:

Mihir Thacker MD